Warum wurde dieser C ++ - Code in Clang Trunk abgelehnt?

Post a reply

Smilies
:) :( :oops: :chelo: :roll: :wink: :muza: :sorry: :angel: :read: *x) :clever:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is ON
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Warum wurde dieser C ++ - Code in Clang Trunk abgelehnt?

by Anonymous » 10 Apr 2025, 01:11

Code: Select all

#include 

template 
concept floating_point = std::is_floating_point_v;

template 
concept integral = std::is_integral_v;

template 
concept arithmetic = floating_point || integral;

// ------------------------------------

template 
constexpr int f() {
return 1;
}

template 
constexpr int f() {
return 2;
}

// ------------------------------------

template 
requires(arithmetic && ...)
constexpr int g() {
return 1;
}

template 
requires(floating_point && ...)
constexpr int g() {
return 2;
}

// ------------------------------------

template 
concept all_arithmetic = (arithmetic && ...);

template 
concept all_floating_point = (floating_point && ...);

template 
requires all_arithmetic
constexpr int h() {
return 1;
}

template 
requires all_floating_point
constexpr int h() {
return 2;
}

// ------------------------------------

static_assert(f() == 1);     // ok
static_assert(f() == 2);  // ok

static_assert(g() == 1);     // ok
static_assert(g() == 2);  // ok

static_assert(h() == 1);     // ok
static_assert(h() == 2);  // error (why is this not resolved even after p2963?)

int main() {}
< /code>
Fehler: < /p>
:67:15: error: call to 'h' is ambiguous
67 | static_assert(h() == 2);  // error (why is this not resolved even after p2963?)
|               ^~~~~~~~~
https://godbolt.org/z/jnye1jqqm
Wenn ich aktuelle Entwurf und p2963r3 richtig gelesen habe Pack sind äquivalent und arithmetische Subsumes floating_point .>

Top